Author | Inapropriate Content |
Campsoup1988 Campsoup1988 Member
Posts: 5 Joined: 13.10.06
| Posted on 17-10-2006 16:37 | |
|
I dont think the image Ana Graça used it apropriate:
http://www.theonemillionmasterpiece.com/en/profile-466430
Edited by P H on 08-12-2006 15:12 |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Jimmy Dean Member
Posts: 2 Joined: 18.10.06
| Posted on 18-10-2006 06:50 | |
|
It's not that bad. Why not just mark it not safe for children? |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
P H Super Administrator
Posts: 213 Joined: 07.09.06
| Posted on 18-10-2006 09:21 | |
|
I think that the image is a great contribution to the OMM. It is an interpretation of probably the most used artistic subject, the human body. It is neither sexual nor offensive, and I think that it is well done using the website tools. |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Jimmy Dean Member
Posts: 2 Joined: 18.10.06
| Posted on 19-10-2006 16:28 | |
|
Yeah it really isn’t anywhere near as bad as someone using the square for shameless self promotion. |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Lisa Stevens Super Administrator
Posts: 62 Joined: 23.07.06
| Posted on 20-10-2006 16:31 | |
|
Hummmm, does that mean that mine is also inapropriate and unsuitable for children? Surely the human body, shown in a non-sexual way is something children should be aware of! Anyway, I think you will have to delete about 5% of squares if this is the case. |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Alicia Thompson Super Administrator
Posts: 215 Joined: 23.09.06
| Posted on 01-11-2006 17:21 | |
|
I don't find it really offensive. I can recognise that the aartist has approached it in an artistic nude kind of way as opposed to the "OMFG LOOK PR0N" kind of way. If this was practised a little more I'd even onsider it bordering on work safe, not that you should be looking at this at work |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
P H Super Administrator
Posts: 213 Joined: 07.09.06
| Posted on 07-12-2006 18:26 | |
|
Update: 07/06/2006 The image in question has been updated and the original completely replaced. |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Jean Leon Chedraun Member
Posts: 5 Joined: 08.12.06
| Posted on 08-12-2006 11:28 | |
|
wow, that is an awesome pic, I think it should definitely stay. ; 3 |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Jamie Collins Member
Posts: 1 Joined: 29.11.06
| Posted on 15-12-2006 17:10 | |
|
some people can be offended but at the end of the day this site asks for art, it isnt very specific. i personally like this |
|
Author | RE: Inapropriate Content |
Alex Holt Member
Posts: 77 Joined: 04.12.06
| Posted on 15-12-2006 17:25 | |
|
People can be over protective about children around the human form. At the end of the day, if its not made as pornography, what is wrong with a child knowing what a person looks like. There is so much stigma attached to it.... realistically, whats the point in censoring things if its essentially 'you cant see these despite the fact you have one of those and so spent the first six months suckling on those, oh and that thing - that things what half the rest of people have got instead of the first thing" I'm not advocatign a nudist society, but I cant help but consider the world imature in a world in which the most powerful country complains more about Janet Jacksons nipple than a war....
Mini-rant over. |
|